Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The proteins which compose the complex of dystrophin and its associated proteins were analyzed by two-dimensional PAGE, i.e., electrofocusing in the presence of 8 M urea followed by SDS PAGE. Silver-staining of the gel showed many more spots than were expected from the results of one-dimensional SDS PAGE. By examination of their reactivity with specific antibodies, various lectins and 3-(trifluoromethyl)-3-(m-[125I]iodophenyl)-diazirine, most of these spots were identified as dystrophin and its associated proteins described previously. Several as yet unidentified minor proteins were also detected. Dystrophin-associated protein A1 was separated into two groups, alpha-A1 and beta-A1, both composed of numerous spots. These groups differed from each other in isoelectric point, molecular mass, and reactivity with antibodies. The beta-A1 group (64 kDa) was more basic than the alpha-A1 group (60 kDa). Beta-A1 but not alpha-A1 reacted with several lectins, indicating that beta-A1 is a glycoprotein. This is incompatible with the report that 59DAG, which corresponds to A1 (alpha-A1 + beta-A1), is not a glycoprotein [Ervasti et al. (1991) Cell 66, 1121-1131]. The charge heterogeneity observed in alpha-A1 and beta-A1 may be partially due to differential phosphorylation. The charge heterogeneity of A2 and A3a may, at least to some extent, be due to differential sialilation of their carbohydrates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamamoto et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: