Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three donor–(π-spacer)–acceptor dyes, coded as DS-3, DS-5 and DS-6, were designed and synthesized for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). These dyes possess the same donor (triarylamine) and acceptor/anchoring group (2-cyanoacrylic acid), but the varied π-spacers consisting of a combination of thiophene and/or 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) units. They were evaluated by photophysical and electrochemical measurements as well as in nanocrystalline TiO2-based DSSCs fabricated using them as light-harvesting sensitizers. The results showed that incorporation of the EDOT moiety in the dye molecules strongly affected the molar extinction coefficient and photocurrent response. Among the three dyes, the DS-5-based DSSCs afforded the best photovoltaic performance: a maximum monochromatic incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) of 80%, a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 14.6 mA cm−2, an open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) of 0.59 V and a fill factor (FF) of 0.70, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency of 6.03% under 100 mW cm−2 irradiation, which reached 77% with respect to that of an N3-based device fabricated and measured under similar conditions. Further, a method of molecular orbital calculations was employed for the insight into the geometrical, electronic and optical properties of these dyes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: