Why the study?
Most electroencephalogram applications use only motor imagery or evoked potentials to assess neurodegenerative diseases and develop brain machine interfaces.
Does a deep learning network based on a sensory motor paradigm improve the detection accuracy of cognitive aging and MCI compared to conventional deep neural networks in healthy and MCI subjects?
Does a deep learning network based on a sensory motor paradigm improve the detection accuracy of cognitive aging and MCI compared to conventional deep neural networks in healthy and MCI subjects?
A deep BLSTM neural network using sensory motor paradigm EEG signals effectively distinguishes cognitive aging and mild cognitive impairment.
This deep learning EEG approach may offer a novel non-invasive biomarker for cognitive decline;.
Electroencephalogram signals are used to assess neurodegenerative diseases and develop sophisticated brain machine interfaces for rehabilitation and gaming. Most of the applications use only motor imagery or evoked potentials. Here, a deep learning network based on a sensory motor paradigm (auditory, olfactory, movement, and motor-imagery) that employs a subject-agnostic Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BLSTM) Network is developed to assess cognitive functions and identify its relationship with brain signal features, which is hypothesized to consistently indicate cognitive decline. Testing occurred with healthy subjects of age 20–40, 40–60, and >60, and mildly cognitive impaired subjects. Auditory and olfactory stimuli were presented to the subjects and the subjects imagined and conducted movement of each arm during which Electroencephalogram (EEG)/Electromyogram (EMG) signals were recorded. A deep BLSTM Neural Network is trained with Principal Component features from evoked signals and assesses their corresponding pathways. Wavelet analysis is used to decompose evoked signals and calculate the band power of component frequency bands. This deep learning system performs better than conventional deep neural networks in detecting MCI. Most features studied peaked at the age range 40–60 and were lower for the MCI group than for any other group tested. Detection accuracy of left-hand motor imagery signals best indicated cognitive aging (p = 0.0012); here, the mean classification accuracy per age group declined from 91.93% to 81.64%, and is 69.53% for MCI subjects. Motor-imagery-evoked band power, particularly in gamma bands, best indicated (p = 0.007) cognitive aging. Although the classification accuracy of the potentials effectively distinguished cognitive aging from MCI (p < 0.05), followed by gamma-band power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sridhar et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: