This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Complexes of the form XL 4 W≡C—C≡WL 4 X (L = 1/2 dmpe, 1/2 depe, P(OMe) 3; X = Cl, OTf) have been synthesized from (Bu t O) 3 WCCW(OBu t ) 3 in two steps via Cl 3 (dme)WCCW(dme)Cl 3, which undergoes facile four-electron reduction in the presence of L. The compounds possess formal d 2 −d 2 electron configurations. The molecular structures of Cl(dmpe) 2 WCCW(dmpe) 2 Cl and Cl{P(OMe) 3 } 4 WCCW{P(OMe) 3 } 4 Cl were determined by X-ray crystallography; bond distances within the backbone are consistent with a W≡C—C≡W canonical structure. Density-functional-theory calculations on Cl(dmpe) 2 WCCW(dmpe) 2 Cl and the model compound Cl(PH 3 ) 4 WCCW(PH 3 ) 4 Cl, and on their monometallic analogs W(CH)(dmpe) 2 Cl and W(CH)(PH 3 ) 4 Cl, indicate that the WCCW backbone is strongly π-conjugated; this is supported by the observation of low-energy π → π* transitions for the compounds. The calculations predict that δ symmetry d xy -derived orbitals should be (or lie near) the highest occupied molecular orbital. Consistent with this prediction, the electronic spectra of the compounds exhibit a band attributable to d xy → π* transition(s), as the lowest-energy feature and electrochemical studies demonstrate that they undergo sequential one-electron oxidations to produce (d xy ) 2 −(d xy ) 1 and (d xy ) 1 −(d xy ) 1 congeners. Due to the δ symmetry of the redox orbitals, the oxidized congeners maintain the W≡C—C≡W canonical structure of the parent d 2 −d 2 compounds. The first and second oxidation potentials of Cl(dmpe) 2 WCCW(dmpe) 2 Cl are separated by ≤0.4 V, corresponding to K com = 10 4 −10 6; the interaction between redox orbitals is largely electrostatic in origin and not the result of significant direct δ orbital overlap. The reaction between Cl(dmpe) 2 WCCW(dmpe) 2 Cl and HCl (2 equiv) produces the d 0 −d 0 dihydride ion [Cl(H)(dmpe) 2 WCCW(dmpe) 2 (H)Cl] 2+, which is formulated as maintaining the W≡C—C≡W backbone on the basis of its X-ray crystal structure and NMR spectra. This family of WCCW derivatives expands the relatively small class of M≡C—C≡M compounds and is distinctive among them because their ancillary ligands should allow incorporation of the L 4 WCCWL 4 unit into interior positions of metalloyne oligomers and polymers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: