This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
(L-L)W(CO)3I2 (L-L = (CH3)2AsC(CF3)== C(CF3)As(CH3)2) reacts with the monodentate phosphite P(OC6H5)3 and (L-L)W(CO)3Br2 reacts with L-L to form new seven-coordinate complexes (L-L)W(CO)2I2P(OC6H5)3 and (L-L)2W(CO)Br2. Low-temperature X-ray diffraction analyses show the tungsten atom to be seven coordinate in both complexes, with the geometry most closely approximated by a monocapped octahedral environment, the capping group being a carbonyl in the dicarbonyl complex; the geometry is most closely approximated by a pentagonal bipyramidal environment in the monocarbonyl complex. The 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR data indicate that the dicarbonyl complex is stereochemically nonrigid at 298 K and rigid at lower temperatures, while the monocarbonyl is nonrigid both at 298 K and at lower temperatures. ΔG not equal values calculated at coalescence temperatures are consistent with an intramolecular rearrangement process for both complexes. The 13C chemical shifts and 2J(13C-31P) values provide important structural considerations in the assignment of a seven-coordinate geometry. Spectroscopic properties for the related seven-coordinate dicarbonyl complexes (L-L)W(CO)2PX2 (P = P(OC6H5)3; X = Br; P = P(OCH3)3, P(C6H5)3; X = Br, I) and monocarbonyl complexes (L-L)2W(CO)I2 and (L-L)W(CO)X2[P(OCH3)3]2 (X = Br, I) are presented and compared to those of the two title complexes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barton et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: