Why the study?
To assess patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis who switched to teriflunomide from other disease-modifying therapies.
Does switching to teriflunomide from other DMTs reduce healthcare resource utilization and relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis?
Does switching to teriflunomide from other DMTs reduce healthcare resource utilization and relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis?
Switching to teriflunomide from other DMTs in relapsing MS patients is associated with reduced annualized relapse rates and lower MS-specific outpatient costs.
Provides real-world utilization and relapse data for teriflunomide switching; leaves open whether these.
Objective: Assess patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who switched to teriflunomide from other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Methods: Retrospective study of US Merative™ MarketScan ® claims database (Jan 1, 2012–July 31, 2020,) including HIPAA-compliant, deidentified data. Patients ≥ 18 years with MS diagnosis (based on ICD-9/ICD-10 codes), receiving ≥ 1 DMT prior to teriflunomide and ≥ 12 months continuous enrollment pre and post index (date of teriflunomide initiation). Outcomes included inpatient and emergency room claims coinciding with MS diagnosis, MS-related healthcare costs, and annualized relapse rates (ARRs) (indirectly assessed using hospitalization/outpatient claims and steroid use coinciding with MS diagnosis). Results: The analyzed cohort (N=2016) was primarily female (79%); age (mean ± standard deviation) 51.4 ± 9.3 years; MS duration 4.7± 2.8 years (at index). The majority (89.2%) were treated with one DMT before switching to teriflunomide. Use of outpatient services (event rate/100 person-years) increased post vs pre index; however, MRI visits significantly reduced over the same period (both P < 0.0001). Costs for MS-specific outpatient visits decreased by $371 per patient per year (PPPY) after switching to teriflunomide. Despite an increase in use post index (0.024 to 0.033 rate/100 person-years; P < 0.0001), costs for MS-specific laboratory services reduced (pre-index: $271 vs $248 PPPY post-index; P =0.02). Fewer patients had relapses after switching (pre-index: n=417 [20.7%]; post-index: n=333 [16.5%]). ARR was significantly lower after switching (pre-index: 0.269 vs post-index: 0.205; P =0.000). Conclusion: Switching to teriflunomide from existing DMTs in patients with relapsing MS resulted in a reduction in outpatient HCRU in this analysis of US claims data. The real-world effectiveness of teriflunomide was generally consistent with efficacy reported in clinical trials, showing a reduction in relapse following a switch to teriflunomide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Araujo et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: