Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Training workers to perform multiple tasks can improve workforce agility for dealing with variations in workload. However, cross-training can be costly, time consuming to implement, is limited by worker learning capacity, and can lead to ambiguity about work responsibilities. Therefore, it is important to implement cross-training in the most efficient way and especially, due to the training time required, in a way that is robust to system changes. We use queueing and simulation analysis to investigate cross-training in the context of maintenance in a manufacturing plant. The tasks are independent and can be represented as a set of parallel queues that are served by dedicated and cross-trained workers. We propose a cross-training strategy called chaining, in which a few workers are strategically cross-trained, and show that it yields most of the benefits of cross-training all workers, with much less effort. Most importantly, we demonstrate that cross-training workers to form a “complete chain” is extremely robust in the following ways: (i) it is insensitive to the variety of ways a complete chain can be formed; (ii) it performs well even if there are major changes to or uncertainty in system parameters (such as mean task arrival rates); and (iii) performance is insensitive to control decisions that, without complete chaining, can significantly harm performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jordan et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: