Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Implications of iron (Fe 3+ ) doping on lithium insertion/de-insertion capacity of anatase TiO 2 is discussed here. Iron doped anatase TiO 2 mesoporous nanoparticulate aggregated at various Fe 3+ doping concentrations was synthesized by an optimized sol-gel method. The electrochemistry and lithium storage capacities of anatase TiO 2 exhibited strong function of dopant iron (Fe 3+ ) concentration. A very high first discharge cycle capacity of 704 mAhg −1 corresponding to approximately 2.1 mol of Li was observed for 5% iron (Fe 3+ ) doped TiO 2 at a current density of 75 mAg −1 . At the 30th discharge cycle, the capacity was remarkably high at 272 mAhg −1 (0.81 mol of Li) with coulombic efficiency greater than 96%. Increase in the iron (Fe 3+ ) concentration beyond 5% resulted in deterioration of lithium storage in TiO 2 . An improvement in lithium storage of more than 50% is noticed for 5% iron (Fe 3+ ) doped TiO 2 compared to pure anatase TiO 2 which shows an initial discharge capacity of 279 mAhg −1 . The anomalous lithium storage behavior in all the iron (Fe 3+ ) doped TiO 2 samples has been accounted, in addition to homogeneous Li insertion in the octahedral sites, via local conversion reaction and heterogeneous interfacial storage at Fe and Li 2 O.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: