Key result
Over the last 10 years, the percentage of Americans who took at least one prescription drug in the past month increased from 44% in 1999-2000 to 48% in 2007-2008.
Why the study?
Behavioral therapies delivered via mobile apps show variable blood pressure results and poor long-term engagement, while machine learning shows potential to generate predictive and responsive models for chronic disease management.
Does a digital therapeutic improve blood pressure in adults with hypertension?
Cross-Sectional
Does a digital therapeutic improve blood pressure in adults with hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 48% vs 44%
p-value: p=<0.05
A digital therapeutic providing personalized behavior therapy significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults with hypertension over a short-term period.
Suggests short-term blood pressure reductions with personalized digital behavior therapy; leaves open whether.
BACKGROUND: Behavioral therapies, such as electronic counseling and self-monitoring dispensed through mobile apps, have been shown to improve blood pressure, but the results vary and long-term engagement is a challenge. Machine learning is a rapidly advancing discipline that can be used to generate predictive and responsive models for the management and treatment of chronic conditions and shows potential for meaningfully improving outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this retrospective analysis were to examine the effect of a novel digital therapeutic on blood pressure in adults with hypertension and to explore the ability of machine learning to predict participant completion of the intervention. METHODS: Participants with hypertension, who engaged with the digital intervention for at least 2 weeks and had paired blood pressure values, were identified from the intervention database. Participants were required to be ≥18 years old, reside in the United States, and own a smartphone. The digital intervention offers personalized behavior therapy, including goal setting, skill building, and self-monitoring. Participants reported blood pressure values at will, and changes were calculated using averages of baseline and final values for each participant. Machine learning was used to generate a model of participants who would complete the intervention. Random forest models were trained at days 1, 3, and 7 of the intervention, and the generalizability of the models was assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation. RESULTS: The primary cohort comprised 172 participants with hypertension, having paired blood pressure values, who were engaged with the intervention. Of the total, 86.1% participants were women, the mean age was 55.0 years (95% CI 53.7-56.2), baseline systolic blood pressure was 138.9 mmHg (95% CI 136.6-141.3), and diastolic was 86.2 mmHg (95% CI 84.8-87.7). Mean change was -11.5 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -5.9 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure over a mean of 62.6 days (P<.001). Among participants with stage 2 hypertension, mean change was -17.6 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -8.8 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. Changes in blood pressure remained significant in a mixed-effects model accounting for the baseline systolic blood pressure, age, gender, and body mass index (P<.001). A total of 43% of the participants tracking their blood pressure at 12 weeks achieved the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association definition of blood pressure control. The 7-day predictive model for intervention completion was trained on 427 participants, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was .78. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in blood pressure were observed in adults with hypertension who used the digital therapeutic. The degree of blood pressure reduction was clinically meaningful and achieved rapidly by a majority of the studied participants. Greater improvement was observed in participants with more severe hypertension at baseline. A successful proof of concept for using machine learning to predict intervention completion was presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guthrie et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Prescription drug use. Time period (2007-2008 vs 1999-2000) vs. 1999-2000 was evaluated on Use of at least one prescription drug in the past month (p=<0.05). Over the last 10 years, the percentage of Americans who took at least one prescription drug in the past month increased from 44% in 1999-2000 to 48% in 2007-2008.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: