Why the study?
Because the majority of the updated ESC recommendations on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronisation are class II and based on expert opinion, a critical appraisal for the Dutch situation was warranted.
This document provides the Dutch national addendum to the 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and CRT, adapting recommendations for local practice and emphasizing shared decision-making.
Provides localized guidance for Dutch pacing and CRT practice; highlights the urgent need for randomized trials given.
The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has updated its guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronisation. As the majority are class II recommendations (61%) and based on expert opinion (59%), a critical appraisal for the Dutch situation was warranted. A working group has been established, consisting of specialists in cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, geriatrics, allied professionals in cardiac pacing, and patient organisations with support from the Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists. They assessed the evidence leading to the recommendations and the suitability for daily Dutch practice. Several recommendations have been amended or omitted altogether if a conflicting Dutch guideline has recently been published, such as a guideline on performing magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. The recent Dutch guideline on implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy has recommended implanting cardiac resynchronisation therapy devices without a defibrillator function. Shared decision making has received a more prominent role in the ESC guidelines and is discussed in more detail in this document. The recommendations given in this document are intended for health care professionals involved in the care of patients with an indication for cardiac pacing and are approved by the participating professional societies and the patient organisation Harteraad.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maass et al. (2025) conducted a review in Indications for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronisation therapy. 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and CRT (Dutch endorsement) was evaluated. The Dutch Society of Cardiology endorsed the 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronisation therapy with specific amendments for Dutch clinical practice, emphasizing shared decision making.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: