Key result
Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy provided no significant added benefit over sham treatment for improving SPADI scores at 6 months (mean change 28.4 vs 30.4).
Why the study?
Does extracorporeal shock-wave therapy improve shoulder pain and disability in adults with chronic non-calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff?
RCT (n=74)
Double-blind
randomised
Does extracorporeal shock-wave therapy improve shoulder pain and disability in adults with chronic non-calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff?
Absolute Event Rate: 28.4% vs 30.4%
p-value: p=not significant
Moderate doses of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy do not provide added benefit over sham treatment for chronic non-calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff.
Does not support ESWT for chronic non-calcific rotator cuff tendinopathy; reinforces sham-controlled evidence against routine use.
We have performed a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of moderate doses of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) for non-calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff. Adults (74) with chronic tendonitis of the rotator cuff were randomised to receive either active (1500 pulses ESWT at 0.12 mJ/mm2) or sham treatment, monthly for three months. All were assessed before each treatment, and at one and three months after the completion of treatment. The outcome was measured with regard to pain in the shoulder, including a visual analogue score for night pain, and a disability index. There were no significant differences between the two groups before treatment. The mean duration of symptoms in both groups was 23.3 months. Both showed significant and sustained improvements from two months onwards. There was no significant difference between them with respect to change in the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores or night pain over the six-month period. A mean (±sd; range) change in SPADI of 16.1 ± 27.2 (0 to 82) in the treatment group and 24.3 ± 24.8 (−11 to 83) in the sham group was noted at three months. At six months the mean changes were 28.4 ± 25.9 (−24 to 69) and 30.4 ± 31.2 (−12 to 88), respectively. Similar results were noted for night pain. We conclude that there is a significant and sustained placebo effect after moderate doses of ESWT in patients with non-calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff, but there is no evidence of added benefit when compared with sham treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franco Astore (2003) conducted an RCT in Chronic non-calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff (n=74). Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) vs. Sham treatment was evaluated on Change in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores at six months (p=not significant). Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy provided no significant added benefit over sham treatment for improving SPADI scores at 6 months (mean change 28.4 vs 30.4).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: