Key result
Multi-spring computational models of myosin cross-bridges demonstrate that axial and radial forces, as well as step size and transition kinetics, depend significantly on myofilament lattice spacing.
Multi-spring computational models of myosin cross-bridges demonstrate that radial forces are comparable to axial forces and that cross-bridge kinetics and forces depend on myofilament lattice spacing.
Lattice spacing modulates myosin forces and kinetics in models; leaves open translation to intact cardiac muscle.
Nearly all mechanochemical models of the cross-bridge treat myosin as a simple linear spring arranged parallel to the contractile filaments. These single-spring models cannot account for the radial force that muscle generates (orthogonal to the long axis of the myofilaments) or the effects of changes in filament lattice spacing. We describe a more complex myosin cross-bridge model that uses multiple springs to replicate myosin's force-generating power stroke and account for the effects of lattice spacing and radial force. The four springs which comprise this model (the 4sXB) correspond to the mechanically relevant portions of myosin's structure. As occurs in vivo, the 4sXB's state-transition kinetics and force-production dynamics vary with lattice spacing. Additionally, we describe a simpler two-spring cross-bridge (2sXB) model which produces results similar to those of the 4sXB model. Unlike the 4sXB model, the 2sXB model requires no iterative techniques, making it more computationally efficient. The rate at which both multi-spring cross-bridges bind and generate force decreases as lattice spacing grows. The axial force generated by each cross-bridge as it undergoes a power stroke increases as lattice spacing grows. The radial force that a cross-bridge produces as it undergoes a power stroke varies from expansive to compressive as lattice spacing increases. Importantly, these results mirror those for intact, contracting muscle force production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2010) studied this question. Multi-spring cross-bridge models (4sXB and 2sXB) vs. Single-spring cross-bridge model (1sXB) was evaluated. Multi-spring computational models of myosin cross-bridges demonstrate that axial and radial forces, as well as step size and transition kinetics, depend significantly on myofilament lattice spacing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: