Key result
An enhanced lifestyle program targeting walking speed lowered resting pulse rate compared to a basic program targeting total steps (71 vs 78 bpm; p=0.03) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Does an enhanced lifestyle programme targeting walking speed improve resting pulse rate and A1c compared to a basic lifestyle programme targeting total daily steps in patients with type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=41)
randomly allocated
Does an enhanced lifestyle programme targeting walking speed improve resting pulse rate and A1c compared to a basic lifestyle programme targeting total daily steps in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: 71% vs 78%
p-value: p=0.03
A pedometer-based lifestyle modification program that progresses to targeting walking speed rather than just total steps significantly lowers resting pulse rate in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Supports speed-targeted walking programs to lower resting pulse rate in type 2 diabetes; extends prior step-volume interventions.
AIM: To examine the impact of two different lifestyle programmes on cardiovascular health and glycaemic control among people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A two-phase 24-week randomized trial. During the first phase, participants were to increase daily steps using a pedometer. At week 12, participants were randomly allocated to either an enhanced lifestyle programme (ELP) targeting walking speed or a basic lifestyle programme (BLP) targeting total daily steps. Both programmes focused on increasing the intake of low glycaemic index foods but utilized different goal setting strategies. Clinical measurements were completed at baseline, week 12 and week 24. Principal outcomes were change in resting pulse rate (PR) and glycated haemoglobin A1c (A1c) between week 12 and week 24 compared between groups using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Forty-one participants [mean +/- s.d. : age = 56.5 +/- 7.2 years, body mass index (BMI) = 32.7 +/- 6.1 kg/m(2)] were randomized. After 12 weeks, we observed an increase in average total daily steps of 1688 (95% confidence interval: 330-3040, [corrected] p = 0.02). Weight, BMI and systolic and diastolic blood pressure improved (p < 0.01 for all). No changes were observed for energy intake. At week 24, those in the ELP had a lower resting PR (71 +/- 12 b.p.m.) compared with those in the BLP (78 +/- 12 b.p.m.) (adjusted p = 0.03), while no group differences for total daily steps or glycaemic control were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in cardiovascular health can be expected following a pedometer-based lifestyle modification programme that progresses from walking more to walking faster.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in type 2 diabetes (n=41). Enhanced lifestyle programme (ELP) targeting walking speed vs. Basic lifestyle programme (BLP) targeting total daily steps was evaluated on Change in resting pulse rate (PR) and glycated haemoglobin A1c (A1c) between week 12 and week 24 (p=0.03). An enhanced lifestyle program targeting walking speed lowered resting pulse rate compared to a basic program targeting total steps (71 vs 78 bpm; p=0.03) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: