Key result
The Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent resulted in similar rates of target lesion failure at 2 years compared to the Nobori biolimus-eluting stent in diabetic patients (9.3% vs 9.4%; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.54-1.78).
Why the study?
Does the Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent reduce target lesion failure compared to the Nobori biolimus-eluting stent in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
RCT (n=2,525)
Does the Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent reduce target lesion failure compared to the Nobori biolimus-eluting stent in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Relative Risk: 0.98 (95% CI 0.54–1.78)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.3% vs 9.4%
In diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent and Nobori biolimus-eluting stent showed comparable rates of target lesion failure at 2 years.
This hypothesis-generating subgroup analysis should not yet change practice; leaves open whether.
OBJECTIVES: In this substudy of the SORT OUT VII trial, the clinical outcomes among patient with diabetes mellitus treated with Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES; Biotronik, Bülach, Switzerland) or Nobori biolimus-eluting stent (N-BES; Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) were compared. BACKGROUND: Diabetes is associated with increased risk of target lesion failure (TLF) after percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: In total, 2525 patients were randomized to stent implantation with O-SES (n = 1261, diabetes: n = 236) or N-BES (n = 1264, diabetes: n = 235). The primary endpoint, TLF, was a composite of cardiac death, target-lesion myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 2 years. RESULTS: At 2 year, TLF did not differ between O-SES vs N-BES in diabetic (9.3% vs 9.4%; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.54-1.78) patients. The individual components of the primary endpoint did not differ among stent type. In diabetics, cardiac death occurred in 3% of O-SES-treated and in 3.8% of N-BES-treated patients (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.29-2.08), MI occurred in 3.0% of O-SES-treated and in 3.8% of N-BES-treated patients (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.28-2.06) and TLR occurred in 5,5% of O-SES-treated and in 6.0% of N-BES-treated patients (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.43-1.95). CONCLUSION: TLF did not differ between O-SES- and N-BES-treated diabetic patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellert‐Gregersen et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Diabetes mellitus requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=2,525). Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) vs. Nobori biolimus-eluting stent (N-BES) was evaluated on Target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target-lesion myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 2 years (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.54-1.78). The Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent resulted in similar rates of target lesion failure at 2 years compared to the Nobori biolimus-eluting stent in diabetic patients (9.3% vs 9.4%; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.54-1.78).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: