Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Four trials were conducted to investigate feed and water intake of three Japanese quail lines reared under different nutritional environments. The P-line quail were established by long-term selection for high 4-week body weight on a 28% protein diet, T-line quail were similarly established on a 20% protein diet containing .2% thiouracil (TU), and C-line quail were from a randomly mated control population maintained under a separate environment from the P and T lines. Through 6 days of age feed intake of T-line quail under the 28% protein environment was significantly higher than feed intake of P-line quail. This difference did not exist from 6 to 14 days of age. Feed intake of T-line quail under 20% protein environments was always numerically higher than feed intake of P-line quail. Water intake of T-line quail was higher than water intake of P-line quail under all environments. The P-line quail tended to have higher feed efficiencies regardless of environment. The ability of quail selected under a 20% protein + .2% TU environment to perform well when placed under a 28% protein environment, was primarily due to increases in feed and water intake rather than changes in feed efficiency. Conversely, the poor performance of quail selected under a 28% protein environment when placed under, a 20% protein + .2% TU environment was due to their inability to maintain adequate feed intake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
H.L. MARKS (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: