Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of (a) crash-pad thickness and (b) midsole height at the heel to reduce heel impact load during running. Twenty male runners performed heel-toe runs in four different shoe conditions. While three shoe conditions had systematic changes in crash-pad thickness without changing general heel height, a fourth shoe condition differed only in overall heel height. Kinetic and kinematic running variables were quantified by using a force platform and an electrogoniometer. Data were collected for five valid running trials at a constant running speed of 3.5 ± 0.1 m s−1. Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests, a one-way repeated measures ANOVA (P < 0.05) as well as effect sizes (η 2) were calculated for all variables. The findings of this study showed that (a) increasing crash-pad thickness resulted in reduced impact variables without influencing traditional rearfoot motion variables. Furthermore, reduced heel height (b) is influencing predominantly rearfoot stability. Consequently, crash-pad modification can be used to improve cushioning properties without influences on rearfoot stability. Furthermore, crash-pad modification allows reducing shoe weight while maintaining cushioning properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heidenfelder et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: