Key result
A 30s-30s intermittent small-sided game elicited similar mean heart rate (88.8% vs 90.4% of peak) but lower peak lactate (6.6 vs 10 mmol/L, P<0.05) compared to shuttle running.
Why the study?
Does a 30s-30s intermittent small-sided game provide similar physiological and affective responses compared to shuttle running and match play in elite male handball players?
Does a 30s-30s intermittent small-sided game provide similar physiological and affective responses compared to shuttle running and match play in elite male handball players?
Absolute Event Rate: 88.8% vs 90.4%
A 30s-30s small-sided game provides a consistent aerobic stimulus with lower affective balance and lower peak lactate compared to shuttle running in elite handball players.
Concept:* Small-sided games offer a comparable aerobic stimulus with less metabolic strain.
Objectives: To compare physiological and affective demands of a novel small-sided game designed in intermittent (30s-30s) regimen opposing 3-a-side field players with 30s-30s shuttle running and handball match play. Methods: Fourteen elite male handball players (age 23.8 4.4 y; body mass 84.0 7.4 kg; height 188 0.06 m) performed 2 periods of 10-min of each experimental exercise in separate occasions. Physiological demand was assessed using mean heart rate, time spent in heart rate intensity zones and postexercise blood lactate concentration. The difference between 'perceived exertion' and 'pleasure' determined the affective balance. Results: Small-sided game and shuttle running drills showed similar mean heart rate (88.8 2.4 and 90.4 2.8 % of peak heart rate, respectively) and time spent in heart rate zones. The match play elicited lower mean heart rate (86.9 3.4 % of peak heart rate, P 0.05, large ES) than small-sided game and shuttle running. Peak lactate for small-sided game (6.6 2.6 mmol/L) was lower than shuttle running (10 2.2 mmol/L, P 0.05, large ES) whereas no significant difference was observed with match play. The small-sided game showed lower affective balance than shuttle running (P 0.01, large ES). Conclusions: Coaches can be confident in prescribing the small-sided game as a suitable alternative to shuttle running to provide consistent aerobic stimulus with lower affective balance. The small-sided game may be considered as a specific training method in achieving relevant physiological adaptations for handball match play.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravier et al. (2018) studied Elite handball players (n=14). Intermittent (30s-30s) small-sided game vs. 30s-30s shuttle running and handball match play was evaluated on Mean heart rate (% of peak heart rate). A 30s-30s intermittent small-sided game elicited similar mean heart rate (88.8% vs 90.4% of peak) but lower peak lactate (6.6 vs 10 mmol/L, P<0.05) compared to shuttle running.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: