The exchanges between pools of partlculate DMSP (pDMSP) and the total dissolved pool of DMSP and DMS [dDMS(P)], as well as dDMS(P) removal rates were investigated in 4 shipboard incubations of amended and slze-fractionated natural planktonic assemblages of the Med~terranean Sea in spring 1995 and in a laboratory expenment wlth cultured populations. In the shipboard experiments, the effects of different concentrations of copepods and the presence/absence of micrograzers were assessed. Removal rates of dDMS[P), obtained from seawater samples spiked with dDMSP (dissolved DMSP), were linearly correlated with dDMS(P) levels in the range 10 to 50 nM and were unrelated to size-fractlonation treatments. The blologlcal turnover rate constant of dDMS(P) was 0 5 d.' In most of thv experiments, production of dDMS(P) was independent of copepod concentration and lowest in waters from which both copepods and micrograzers > l 0 pm had been removed. Overall, the results of the sh~pboard expenments suggested that (1) dDMS(P) production occurred in the microplanktonic food web, probably because pDMSP occurred predorn~nately In the slze fraction c10 pm and was unavailable for direct copepod consurnptlon, and (2) dDMS(P) removal rates were likely due to organisms < l 0 pm in size, probably bacteria. The laboratory experiment lnvolved a common Med~terranean microplanktonic ciliate specles (Strombid~um s~rlcaturn) grazing on a DMSP-containing Pryrrlnesiophyceae (Isochrysis gaibana) The rate of dDMS[P) release from algal DMSP was greatly increased when the phytoplankton was subjected to grazing by ciliates. The majority of prey pDMSP ( > M % ) was released to solution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christaki et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: