Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: membrane enables continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with endotoxin and cytokine adsorption, but data from low- and middle-income countries are scarce. Methods: in a Colombian public tertiary hospital (January 2021-March 2023). The primary outcome was renal recovery, defined as dialysis independence at discharge. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, vasopressor trajectories and hemodynamics over 72 hours, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and outcomes stratified by COVID-19 status. Results: Fifty patients were analyzed (median age 56.5 [IQR 46.0-66.0] years; 32% male); 21 (42%) had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Norepinephrine requirements fell from 0.303 to 0.000 µg/kg/min over 72 hours (p<0.001), and vasopressin use declined to zero (p<0.001), while mean arterial pressure increased from 74.5 to 83.0 mmHg. In-hospital mortality was 62% (31/50) and was higher in patients with greater baseline severity (APACHE II 21.5 vs 14.5 in survivors; p=0.023). ICU length of stay was 14.0 days [5.0-22.5] and was longer in survivors than non-survivors (21.0 vs 8.0 days; p<0.001). Among survivors, 63% (12/19) were dialysis-independent at discharge. COVID-19 septic shock was associated with higher crude mortality (76% vs 52%) and lower renal recovery among survivors (9.5% vs 34%) compared with non-COVID sepsis. COVID-19 septic shock showed a distinct profile, with higher baseline severity, a trend toward higher mortality, and impaired renal recovery. These data support feasibility and safety of hemoadsorptive CRRT in constrained settings and justify prospective comparative evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ballesteros et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: