Key result
Flushing epidural catheters before insertion significantly delayed the detection of intravenous placement compared to unflushed catheters in vivo (median 19.2 s vs 9.2 s, P=0.003).
Why the study?
Does flushing epidural catheters before insertion delay the detection of intravenous placement compared to unflushed catheters?
RCT (n=20)
randomised crossover
Does flushing epidural catheters before insertion delay the detection of intravenous placement compared to unflushed catheters?
Flushing epidural catheters before insertion delays the detection of intravenous placement, suggesting they should be inserted unflushed to improve safety.
Supports inserting epidural catheters unflushed to expedite IV placement detection; extends in vitro data to in vivo clinical practice.
Undetected intravenous placement of epidural catheters is rare but potentially fatal and no perfect identification method exists. Epidural catheters may be flushed before insertion to identify faulty epidural catheters, or to prime the system with local anaesthetic. We hypothesised that flushing epidural catheters before insertion may delay the detection of intravenous placement. We investigated our theory using both in vitro and in vivo models. The in vitro component examined flowrates in flushed and unflushed epidural catheters, using conditions designed to mimic epidural venous pressure. The in vivo component examined the flow within flushed and unflushed epidural catheters inserted into the forearm veins of 20 anaesthetised patients, using a randomised crossover design. The end-point utilised for both components was the time taken for frank blood to reach the 20 cm mark on the epidural catheter. Blood flow to the 20 cm mark on the epidural catheter was significantly faster in the unflushed catheters than the flushed catheters, both in vitro and in vivo (in vitro, unflushed median = 18.6 s (range: 18.0 to 20.5 s), flushed 37.6 s (32.6 to 91.2 s), P = 0.0009; in vivo, unflushed 9.2 seconds (range 5.0 to 35.3 s), flushed 19.2 s (10.6 to 47.4 s), P = 0.003 in vivo). Flushed catheters also demonstrated a greater variability in the range of flowrates. Flushing epidural catheters before insertion may delay the detection of intravenous placement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bell et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in Anaesthetised patients requiring epidural catheters (n=20). Flushing epidural catheters before insertion vs. Unflushed epidural catheters was evaluated on Time taken for frank blood to reach the 20 cm mark on the epidural catheter (p=0.003). Flushing epidural catheters before insertion significantly delayed the detection of intravenous placement compared to unflushed catheters in vivo (median 19.2 s vs 9.2 s, P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: