Why the study?
What is the optimal way of detecting intravascular placement of an epidural catheter?
What is the optimal way of detecting intravascular placement of an epidural catheter?
This review evaluates methods for detecting intravascular epidural catheter placement, a potentially fatal complication that may go unrecognized in 1% of all insertions.
Highlights ongoing risk of missed intravascular epidural placement; leaves open identification of the most reliable detection technique.
Intravascular placement of an epidural catheter is recognised as a potentially fatal complication of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia. Up to 10% of epidural catheters may be inserted into an epidural vessel, the majority of which will be recognised; however, a proportion (1% of all epidural catheters inserted) may not be identified as lying intravascularly. Opinions differ on the optimal method for identifying intravascular catheters and no perfect method exists. Some debate the need for a test of correct location, as a lack of specificity may mean that a proportion of correctly located catheters are withdrawn and resited. This review outlines the incidence and risk factors associated with intravascular placement and aims to evaluate the detection methods that have been described, in an attempt to answer the question: "What is the optimal way of detecting intravascular placement of an epidural catheter?"
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bell et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: