Emergency room visits for symptomatic atrial fibrillation result in frequent treatment modifications, with therapeutic decision-making generally classified as good, though overall documentation quality has room for improvement.
Documentation quality lags in over half of AF emergency visits; leaves open whether targeted improvements affect outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in emergency rooms (ER). We surveyed the clinical characteristics and quality of care of AF patients in three emergency rooms in Helsinki, Finland. DESIGN: Observational data of the treatment of 179 consecutive symptomatic AF patients were prospectively collected. The quality of care was analysed according to a predestined set of criteria. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 63 years and 61% were men. The leading symptom was palpitation (86%). Sinus rhythm was achieved in 70%. New anticoagulation was initiated in 20% and cardiovascular medication modified in 42% of patients. Considering the overall quality of care, including documentation in the patient chart, it was classified as good in 53% of all patients, whereas the quality of therapeutic decisions and planning for follow-up was good in 77%. CONCLUSIONS: The ER visit results in extensive treatment modifications in two of three patients. Although inadequate care is rare, maintaining good quality requires adherence to clinical guidelines, careful documentation and plans for follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kyhälä-Valtonen et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: