Accuracy and Efficiency of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Analysis, Using Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Effect of Image Reconstruction Window Within Cardiac Phase, Slice Thickness, and Interval of Short-Axis Sections

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy and efficiency of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) analysis by multidetector row computed tomography (CT). METHODS AND RESULTS: The CT data of 21 patients were analyzed by semi-automated software on a workstation. In analysis of LVEF using systolic volumes in the 6 phases (30-55%), systolic images of 10% interval (35, 45, 55%) were underestimated with a mean measurement error of -0.4% and the standard error of the estimate (SEE) of 0.6%, compared with the LVEF using images of 5% interval. In analysis of LVEF using 3-slice thicknesses of axial images (1, 2, and 3 mm), and 3-slice numbers of short-axis sections (10 14, and 30 slices), there was no significant difference between the SEE of the intraobserver reproducibility and that of the analysis with 30 short-axis sections using axial images of 1-, 2- and 3-mm thickness, and that with 14 short-axis sections using axial images of 1- and 2-mm thickness. The mean analysis times were 96.9 s, 119.8 s, and 227.0 s for the analysis with 10, 14, and 30 short-axis sections, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proper selection of the reconstruction interval in the cardiac phase, the slice thickness of the axial images, and the number of short-axis sections reduces the analysis time, maintaining the accuracy of LVEF analysis. This will be acceptable for practical use at present, although more accurate analysis is preferable.