Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Numerical analysis demonstrates error bounds for Nitsche's method on approximate domains, highlighting distinct geometric error behaviors across different Sobolev norms.
We derive a priori error estimates for Nitsche's method applied to elliptic problems on approximate domains. Such approximations arise, for example, in unfitted finite element methods, data-driven simulations, and evolving domain problems, where the computational domain does not coincide exactly with the physical one. We quantify geometric errors in terms of boundary location and normal perturbations and carry out the analysis in an abstract CutFEM framework under standard stability assumptions. In the energy norm, we obtain an estimate exhibiting an h-1/2 amplification of the boundary location error. We then prove a refined H¹-seminorm estimate that removes this amplification, yielding a sharper bound with additive contributions from boundary location and normal errors. Finally, we establish an optimal order L²-error estimate based on a refined duality argument, where the geometry contribution appears as a separate additive term, decoupled from the mesh size h. The results reveal a fundamental distinction between the norms: the energy norm amplifies boundary location errors while remaining insensitive to normal perturbations, the H¹-seminorm separates location and normal errors, and the L²-norm is insensitive to normal perturbations. This provides a clear characterization of how geometric approximation affects convergence in Nitsche-based finite element methods, with particular relevance for unfitted discretizations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: