Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review and meta-analysis reveals increased oxidative damage and reduced antioxidant capacity in periodontitis patients, indicating strong local and systemic biomarker associations.
To update and extend our previously published 2019 systematic review by evaluating oxidative stress (OS) biomarkers in saliva, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), and blood in relation to periodontitis. We systematically searched five electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to May 2025. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled to compare biomarker levels between periodontitis patients and healthy controls. A total of 62 studies were included. Notably, substantial between-study heterogeneity (most I 2 > 50%) was detected across pooled analyses. Total antioxidant capacity (TAOC) was significantly reduced in periodontitis patients across all sample types (blood: SMD = –1.94; saliva: SMD = –1.01; GCF: SMD = –2.30). Malondialdehyde (MDA) was elevated in blood (SMD = 1.06), saliva (SMD = 1.63), and GCF (SMD = 2.50). 8-Hydroxy-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and nitric oxide (NO) were significantly elevated in saliva and GCF, and blood and saliva, respectively. Total oxidant status (TOS) was elevated in saliva and GCF but not in blood. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) did not show significant differences. Periodontitis is merely associated rather than causally linked with impaired antioxidant capacity and elevated oxidative stress, particularly in local biofluids. Although saliva and GCF show higher detection sensitivity than blood, such superiority needs further validated by well-designed comparative statistical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: