Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective case series demonstrates intermittent deviation predicts motor alignment in children with hypermetropic esotropia, indicating eyeglasses alone may often suffice.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether factors observed at initial clinical examination are predictors of the ability to achieve motor alignment with single vision spectacles in hypermetropic children with esotropia. METHODS: Prospective case series. Thirty-eight children with esotropia from 6 months to 13 years of age were analyzed, out of the 46 recruited. Successful outcome was considered when the angle of deviation for distance was less than 10 prism diopters with the prescribed spectacles. RESULTS: Among the factors analyzed, intermittent esotropia ( P = 0.028) and higher refractive error ( P = 0.029) were significantly associated with achievement of motor alignment. Logistic regression showed intermittent deviation had a 5.5 times greater chance of successful outcome with spectacles alone ( P = 0.039, regression coefficient, 1.717; 95% CI, 1.089 to 28.450). CONCLUSION: The presence of intermittent deviation had a statistically significant chance of successful motor outcome with spectacles alone in children with hypermetropia and esotropia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: