Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey reveals food insecurity strongly drives psychological distress in college students, suggesting subjective identity better flags nutritional risk.
Food insecurity is prevalent among college students and disproportionately burdens first-generation students. This study examined how food insecurity and first-generation identity-operationalized objectively (parental education) and subjectively (self-identification), relate to depression, anxiety, stress, and well-being among 344 students at a mid-sized public university. Food insecurity was the strongest predictor of all four outcomes (partial η 2 = 0.064–0.096, all ps < 0.001). Neither objective nor subjective first-generation status independently predicted symptom severity after accounting for food insecurity. However, subjective first-generation identification significantly predicted food insecurity risk (χ 2 = 9.75, p = 0.002) whereas objective classification did not ( p = 0.088), and survived covariate adjustment (aOR = 1.81, p = 0.015). “Over-identifiers”—students who self-identified as first-generation despite having a college-educated parent—showed the highest food-insecurity prevalence (61.1%). These findings suggest incorporating subjective indicators of first-generation status can better identify at-risk students and inform more equitable mental health interventions within higher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mutai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: