Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Literary analysis reveals how Arminian soteriology shapes moral conflict in Richardson's Clarissa, highlighting devotional imitation behind sentimental eighteenth-century fiction.
From an Arminian, soteriological perspective, Samuel Richardson’s Pamela and Clarissa are about men tempted by the universal, prevenient grace that conveys the appetite for good. The theories of David Hume and Adam Smith shed little light on Richardson, because they don’t explain normativity (the experience of “good” being good), and the sentimental philosophers who do explain normativity—Shaftesbury and Francis Hutcheson—have recourse to the Holy Spirit to implant their moral sense. The universality of Arminian prevenient grace—grace that prefigures actual conversion, granted by the Holy Spirit—makes possible in Clarissa Lovelace’s unique struggle for evil against his temptation toward good. A novel that represents the world through Arminian theology then becomes an explicit meditation when Lovelace hands Clarissa a copy of Jeremy Taylor’s Living and Dying, a book of meditations, some composed by the author, others made up of disparate Bible verses. Clarissa starts writing her own meditations in that style. Taylor’s text, moreover, is part of the imitation tradition, which extols the virtue of being like Christ literally, right down to being betrayed by one’s friends. In the end Clarissa dies a martyr, imitating Christ so completely that her death, too, is a triumph.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Manno (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: