Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Narrative review outlines design principles and translational hurdles of injectable hydrogels for tissue defects, highlighting interdisciplinary pathways to clinical adoption.
Biodegradable hydrogels are injected in situ to create scaffolds in complex tissue defects with a minimally invasive approach. The current narrative review critically discusses their design principles such as polymer type (natural, synthetic and hybrid systems), crosslinking processes (physical, chemical, and self-crosslinking strategies), and optimization of their rheological properties for clinical injectability. Various advanced biofunctionalization strategies such as cell encapsulation, spatiotemporal delivery of growth factors, extracellular matrix mimicry via fiber-reinforced composites, and active immunomodulation are assessed for their application in tissue-specific regeneration in cartilage, bone, cardiac, neural, skin, and dental applications. While there has been significant progress in preclinical work, there are significant translational challenges that remain: mechanical mismatch with load-bearing native tissues, natural polymer batch-to-batch variability, unpredictable degradation rates, and a complex regulatory pathway for combination products. We explore under-explored areas such as 4D bioprinting for dynamic shape morphing, the design of materials through artificial intelligence, and closed-loop theranostic platforms that combine real-time biosensing with on-demand therapeutic release. This review suggests that the interdisciplinary convergence of materials science, bioengineering, and regulatory science is necessary to tackle these challenges and make injectable hydrogels a standard-of-care regenerative therapeutic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abedini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: