Comparative study demonstrates that modified highland barley flour alters dough rheology and noodle texture, suggesting optimal substitution thresholds of 15% to 20% for staple foods.
Highland barley (HB) is nutritionally rich but its low gluten content limits its use in wheat-based staple products. This study systematically compared the effects of substituting wheat flour with superfine grinding modified highland barley flour (SG-HBF) or ultrasonically modified highland barley flour (US-HBF) at 10–30% ratios on the properties and quality of wheat flour, dough, and noodles. Results showed that SG-HBF reduced the peak viscosity, breakdown, and setback value of the blended flour, enhanced its thermal stability and anti-aging properties; whereas, US-HBF significantly increased the viscosity. Noodles maintained good sensory and cooking quality when SG-HBF ≤ 15% or US-HBF ≤ 20%. Beyond these thresholds, the cooking loss increased sharply and overall acceptability declined. At the same substitution ratio, SG-HBF outperformed US-HBF in terms of water distribution, cooking loss, and sensory scores, offering better processing efficiency, while US-HBF provides higher springiness and lower broken rate, suitable for products requiring noodle integrity. This study provides a reference for the application of modified HBF in wheat-based products.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: