Key result
Ultrasound-guided FICB with 0.25% bupivacaine lowers 20-minute pain scores versus 0.125% bupivacaine.
Why the study?
Evidence comparing different concentrations of bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block in femur fracture surgery remains limited.
Does 0.25% bupivacaine improve postoperative analgesia compared to 0.125% bupivacaine in patients undergoing femur fracture surgery with ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal FICB?
RCT (n=90)
double-blind
randomized
Does 0.25% bupivacaine improve postoperative analgesia compared to 0.125% bupivacaine in patients undergoing femur fracture surgery with ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal FICB?
Ultrasound-guided suprainguinal FICB with 0.25% bupivacaine provides superior postoperative analgesia and reduced analgesic requirements compared to 0.125% bupivacaine in femur fracture surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Optimizes dosing strategies for postoperative analgesia in femur fractures; extends regional anesthesia evidence.
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is increasingly used for postoperative analgesia in femur fracture surgery. However, evidence comparing different concentrations of bupivacaine for this block remains limited. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of 0.25% and 0.125% bupivacaine administered through ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal FICB in patients undergoing femur fracture surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 90 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients aged 18-50 years undergoing elective femur fracture fixation under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two groups: Group A (n = 45) received 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and Group B (n = 45) received 20 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal FICB. Postoperative pain scores, rescue analgesic requirements, hemodynamic parameters, sensory blockade, ambulation, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. Visual Analog Scale scores at rest and during movement 20 min after block administration were significantly lower in Group A (P < 0.001). Postoperative pain scores remained significantly lower in Group A at 2, 4, 6, and 18 h. Patients receiving 0.25% bupivacaine had significantly greater sensory blockade, lower total rescue analgesic consumption, earlier time to first rescue analgesia, and more stable hemodynamic parameters than those receiving 0.125% bupivacaine (P < 0.05). No major complications or adverse effects were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided suprainguinal FICB is an effective and safe technique for postoperative analgesia in femur fracture surgery. Compared with 0.125% bupivacaine, 0.25% bupivacaine provided superior analgesia, prolonged pain relief, reduced analgesic requirements, and better hemodynamic stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in femur fracture surgery (n=90). 0.25% bupivacaine vs. 0.125% bupivacaine was evaluated on Visual Analog Scale scores at rest and during movement 20 min after block administration (p=<0.001). Ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal FICB with 0.25% bupivacaine provided significantly lower Visual Analog Scale scores at 20 minutes compared to 0.125% bupivacaine (P < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: