Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study reveals increased injury severity and resource utilization from farm animal trauma in older agricultural workers, highlighting the need for targeted safety interventions.
Agriculture remains one of the most hazardous industries in the United States, and livestock-related trauma represents an important source of injury in rural communities. As the agricultural workforce ages, understanding age-related differences in farm animal-related trauma has become increasingly important. Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients presenting with farm animal-related injuries to three regional trauma centers in Southern Appalachia between 2015 and 2024. Patients were stratified into geriatric (≥65 years) and non-geriatric (<65 years) groups. Demographics, comorbidities, injury characteristics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) by body region, interventions, and clinical outcomes were compared. Results: A total of 333 patients were included, of whom 60 (18.0%) were geriatric. Older adults were significantly more likely to sustain cow/bull-related injuries, while younger patients more frequently sustained horse-related injuries. Geriatric patients demonstrated greater injury severity, higher rates of rib fractures, femur fractures, lower-extremity fractures, and flail chest. Older adults also had higher odds of ICU admission, transfusion, and were less likely to be discharged directly home. Discussion: Farm animal-related trauma in older adults is associated with greater injury severity, increased thoracic and lower-extremity injury burden, higher transfusion requirements, increased health care resource utilization, and lower rates of discharge home. As the agricultural workforce continues to age, targeted injury-prevention strategies and trauma-system planning efforts should focus on reducing the burden of livestock-related injury among older agricultural workers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cote et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: