Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) reduces mortality in pediatric trauma when added to component therapy (CT;ie, any protocol based on ratios of isolated blood components). Despite this benefit, no cost-effectiveness analysis has compared the strategies. We built a decision tree comparing LTOWB+CT with CT alone for previously healthy children under 16 requiring massive transfusion. We used a 30-day horizon, a US Level I trauma center perspective, and a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000 per mortality averted. LTOWB+CT averted 2.7 additional deaths per 100 patients and cost $788.32 more per case. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $29,571.17 per mortality averted; LTOWB+CT was cost-effective in 58% of iterations. Cost-effectiveness was lost below a willingness to pay of $25,000, above an LTOWB unit cost of $1,566.18, or more than 5.3 LTOWB or 9.1 packed red cell units. Low-titer group O whole blood is a cost-effective addition to pediatric massive transfusions protocols (MTP), but definable economic limits bind its value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: