Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates improved durability and chloride resistance in fly ash concrete, suggesting a viable strategy for structures in aggressive environments.
Concrete is the most used construction material, but its long-term performance depends on durability. Although fly ash has been used as a supplementary cementitious material, the effects of its mechanical activation on the concrete durability require further investigation. This study evaluated the influence of replacing 30% of cement with natural Class F fly ash (NFA) and ground fly ash (GFA) in concrete with a water-to-binder ratio (w/b) of 0.62, using a mixture without fly ash (WFA) as reference. Mechanical activation was performed by milling the fly ash, followed by characterization through particle size analysis and X-ray diffraction. Concrete durability was assessed using electrical resistivity, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), water absorption, porosity, rapid chloride permeability (RCPT), carbonation resistance, and compressive strength tests. Mechanical milling reduced and transformed the ash morphology from spherical to amorphous, while quartz and mullite remained the main crystalline phases. Compared with CNFA, CGFA exhibited up to 101% higher electrical resistivity, 39.6% greater resistance to chloride penetration, 10.8% improved carbonation resistance, 0.4% lower water absorption, and a 5.38% reduction in porosity, although compressive strength decreased by more than 20%. These results demonstrate that mechanically activated fly ash is a viable alternative for enhancing the concrete durability performance exposed to aggressive environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lopez-Miguel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: