Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey study demonstrates perceived greenwashing drives destination rejection via risk perception and trust betrayal in tourists, highlighting the critical impact of claim-action gaps.
This study examines how perceived greenwashing influences tourists’ service rejection intention toward green tourism destinations in Vietnam. Using a quantitative approach, survey data collected from 444 tourists were analyzed via partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results demonstrate that perceived greenwashing initiates a sequential cognitive-affective-behavioral process, whereby perceived green risk and perceived green trust betrayal intensify negative electronic word-of-mouth, ultimately leading to service rejection intention. Among the dimensions of greenwashing, the claim-action gap (GW_KC) exerts the strongest impact on both cognitive and affective responses, underscoring the critical role of inconsistency between communicated sustainability claims and actual practices. By conceptualizing greenwashing as a destination-level credibility and trust issue, this study contributes to green tourism theory and provides managerial implications for strengthening sustainability governance and destination credibility in emerging green tourism contexts such as Vietnam.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Le et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: