Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study finds distinct initial manifestations but comparable disease activity in late-onset lupus, indicating frequent need for intensive immunosuppressive therapy.
Objectives This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics of patients with late-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) during the initial stage of disease onset and to evaluate disease activity. Method Data from patients with SLE whose disease onset was ≤3 months were retrospectively collected, and the patients were classified into the late- and early-onset SLE groups based on an age cutoff of 50 years. Results This study included 145 patients, including 31 with late-onset SLE and 114 with early-onset SLE. Compared with the early-onset SLE group, the late-onset SLE group had a lower prevalence of rash (25.8% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.040) and anti-dsDNA antibody positivity (54.8% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.027), whereas pericarditis was more frequent (29.0% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.047) and the C3 levels were higher (0.640 [0.400, 0.892] g/L vs. 0.460 [0.324, 0.701] g/L, p = 0.018). As regards disease activity, the SLEDAI 2000 was 10 (8, 20) in the late-onset SLE group and 15 (10, 22) in the early-onset SLE group ( p = 0.066), whereas the SLE-DAS was similar between the groups (13.33 [11.50, 28.45] vs 15.48 [8.56, 25.18], p = 0.744). More than half of patients with late-onset SLE received high-dose or intravenous pulse corticosteroid therapy, with no statistically significant difference compared with patients with early-onset SLE. Conclusions Patients with very early-stage late-onset SLE exhibited distinct clinical and serological features. However, their disease activity was essentially consistent with that of early-onset SLE, and they often require intensive immunosuppressive therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: