Computational study finds BLSTM networks outperform CNNs across American and Saudi speech datasets, highlighting the benefit of combining prosodic, acoustic, and rhythm features.
Over the last few decades, deep learning systems have achieved significant success in speech-based interaction, including the classification of spoken dialects. Spoken dialect classification using deep learning systems aims to classify speech signals based on their features. In this article, we propose a spoken American and Saudi dialects classification system that compares Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BLSTM) classifiers with the Texas Instruments Massachusetts Institute of Technology (TIMIT) corpus and Saudi Accented Arabic Voice Bank (SAAVB) using a combination of carefully chosen speech features to uncover fruitful outcomes. After a series of experiments, the accuracies of the proposed systems using the CNN classifier for spoken American dialects classification with prosodic, acoustic, and Rhythm-Metrix features, and all their combinations, achieved 13.12%, 58.00%, 51.01%, and 68.50%, respectively. Likewise, we achieved classification accuracies of 9.06%, 32.03%, 28.78%, and 48.01% using the same features for spoken Saudi dialect classification. Compared with the proposed system using the BLSTM classifier, we achieved 21.83%, 56.03%, 65.63%, and 75.87% for spoken American dialects classification, and 10.18%, 13.89%, 47.20%, and 60.19% for spoken Saudi dialects classification, using the same features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikrish et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: