Qualitative study reveals significant indirect trauma among youth justice practitioners hearing trauma narratives, highlighting the critical need for institutional support systems.
The child–practitioner relationship is crucial in encouraging engagement in justice settings while providing a relational space for the child to feel supported and nurtured. Within such relational spaces, trauma narratives may be shared with practitioners, which can manifest in healing for the child but leave emotional residue with the practitioner. Therefore, issues stemming from indirect trauma, such as secondary traumatic stress and vicarious trauma, emerge as a potential outcome of a relational, trauma-informed way of working and thus require careful management and support mechanisms. This article will consider the child–practitioner relationship advocated within trauma-informed youth justice, the emotional demands of working through a relational lens and, consequently, indirect trauma as a risk for youth justice staff within the justice system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brierley-Sollis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: