This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This article examines far-right mobilisation following the July 2024 Southport attack through qualitative investigation of 5180 images and videos across Alt-Tech (Gab, Odysee, Rumble, Mastodon, and BitChute) and mainstream social media (X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube). Analysis reveals six analytically separate content strategies – organisational propaganda, AI-generated imagery, misinformation, appropriated mainstream media, authority figure content, and user-generated tactical material – exposing a sophisticated, layered infrastructure rather than a homogeneous body of extremist material. The study documents Gab’s function as an ecosystem hub aggregating content from mainstream broadsheets, political parties, academic commentators, civil liberties organisations, and Alt-Tech platforms into a single re-contextualisation infrastructure. Extending Social Learning Theory and Social Disorganisation Theory to digital contexts, the article proposes three concepts: algorithmic super peers, digitally disorganised communities, and bi-directional narrative laundering. Together, these concepts demonstrate that contemporary extremist networks exploit digital architecture structurally rather than through deliberate coordination, with urgent implications for platform governance and regulatory intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashton Kingdon (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: