Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis demonstrates direction-resolved Lieb–Schultz–Mattis gap upper bounds in quantum systems, indicating geometric range overestimates twist energy costs.
Geometric interaction range can overestimate the energy cost of a Lieb–Schultz–Mattis twist. We derive finite-ring upper bounds on fractional-sector gaps from the twist phases connecting an interaction’s joint charge sectors. The shortest circular phase-arc radius is the exact minimum norm of a charge-algebra logarithm implementing the local twist, and its decomposition envelope is independent of a chosen interaction presentation. For a specified local term, a finite-dimensional transport quotient bounds this phase cost and has a closed wrapped-polarization formula for arbitrary-order correlated hopping. For a spin-1/2 chain, we exactly evaluate the quadratic and finite-angle envelopes. On graph-fiber cylinders, the bound is direction resolved: charge-conserving dynamics within a transverse slice has exactly zero longitudinal cost. Power-law moving tails give an explicit width–decay crossover. Even when every pair of transverse channels is coupled by a Euclidean dipolar tail, the bound vanishes if W_L^2[1 + log(L/W_L)] = o(L); a charge-moving van der Waals tail remains O(W_L/L). For even longitudinal size, an odd-leg ladder corollary is independent of arbitrary translated SU(2)-invariant rung dynamics. These are upper bounds on the gap, not evaluations of the physical gap itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: