Key result
Objective CMD linked to ~3-fold higher MACE risk in INOCA.
Why the study?
Available prognostic evidence on CMD in INOCA remains heterogeneous in diagnostic methods, CMD definitions, outcome definitions, and reported effect measures.
Does objectively verified coronary microvascular dysfunction increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in adults with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries?
Systematic Review (n=3,448)
Does objectively verified coronary microvascular dysfunction increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in adults with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries?
Objectively identified coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with INOCA, though heterogeneity in study designs precludes quantitative pooling.
May inform INOCA prognosis; leaves open whether CMD-targeted therapy reduces MACE pending randomized trials.
Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a major pathophysiological substrate of ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA), but available prognostic evidence remains heterogeneous in diagnostic methods, CMD definitions, outcome definitions, and reported effect measures. We conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis of cohort studies examining the association between objectively verified CMD and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in adults with INOCA. MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to June 2026. Eight cohort studies representing eight unique countries met eligibility criteria and were included in the narrative synthesis. Two independent cohorts reported adjusted dichotomous hazard ratios for a CMD-versus-no-CMD contrast: HR 2.97, 95% CI 1.39-6.34 and HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.22-7.97, respectively. The largest and highest-quality included study (N=1,681, NOS 9/9) reported an adjusted hazard ratio for continuous coronary flow velocity reserve and was summarized narratively. The remaining studies reported non-comparable effect measures, exposure scales, adjustment levels, or overlapping cohorts. Because of heterogeneity in CMD definitions, diagnostic modalities, exposure scales, and effect-measure types, no meta-analysis was performed. Available observational evidence suggests that objectively identified CMD may be associated with increased MACE risk in patients with INOCA. Larger prospective studies using standardized CMD definitions, harmonized MACE outcomes, adequate follow-up, and consistently adjusted time-to-event analyses are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdallah et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) (n=3,448). Coronary microvascular dysfunction vs. No coronary microvascular dysfunction was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Objectively identified coronary microvascular dysfunction was associated with an approximately 3-fold increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with INOCA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: