Key result
Ischemic preconditioning significantly reduced myocardial infarct size in wild-type mice regardless of sex and ischemic duration, but this cardioprotective effect was absent in eNOS knockout mice.
Why the study?
Does ischemic preconditioning reduce myocardial infarct size in wild-type and eNOS knockout mice?
Does ischemic preconditioning reduce myocardial infarct size in wild-type and eNOS knockout mice?
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is required for the cardioprotective effects of acute in vivo ischemic preconditioning against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No immediate clinical implications; confirms eNOS dependence of ischemic preconditioning cardioprotection in mice.
Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is a powerful phenomenon that provides potent cardioprotection in mammalian hearts; however, the role of endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase (eNOS)-mediated NO in this process remains highly controversial. Questions also remain regarding this pathway as a function of sex and ischemic duration. Therefore, we performed extensive experiments in wild-type (WT) and eNOS knockout (eNOS(-/-)) mice to evaluate whether the infarct-limiting effect of IPC depends on eNOS, ischemic periods, and sex. Classical IPC was induced by three cycles of 5 min of regional coronary ischemia separated by 5 min of reperfusion and was followed by 30 or 60 min of sustained ischemia and 24 h of reperfusion. The control ischemia-reperfusion protocol had 30 or 60 min of ischemia followed by 24 h of reperfusion. Protection was evaluated by measuring the myocardial infarct size as a percentage of the area at risk. The major findings were that regardless of sex, WT mice exhibited robust IPC with significantly smaller myocardial infarction, whereas eNOS(-/-) mice did not. IPC-induced cardiac protection was absent in eNOS(-/-) mice of both Jackson and Harvard origin. In general, female WT mice had smaller infarctions compared with male WT mice. Although prolonged ischemia caused significantly larger infarctions in WT mice of both sexes, they were consistently protected by IPC. Importantly, prolonged myocardial ischemia was associated with increased mortality in eNOS(-/-) mice, and the survival rate was higher in female eNOS(-/-) mice compared with male eNOS(-/-) mice. In conclusion, IPC protects WT mice against in vivo myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury regardless of sex and ischemic duration, but the deletion of eNOS abolishes the cardioprotective effect of classical IPC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talukder et al. (2010) studied Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) vs. Control ischemia-reperfusion protocol was evaluated on Myocardial infarct size as a percentage of the area at risk. Ischemic preconditioning significantly reduced myocardial infarct size in wild-type mice regardless of sex and ischemic duration, but this cardioprotective effect was absent in eNOS knockout mice.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: