Key result
This is a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing CEA, CAS, and best medical therapy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis; no results are available.
Why the study?
Widespread use of lipid-lowering drugs has improved BMT outcomes, prompting a comparison of current BMT, CEA+BMT, and CAS+BMT in significant asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.
Do different treatment strategies (CEA+BMT, CAS+BMT, or BMT alone) improve mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction in patients with significant asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis?
Systematic Review
Do different treatment strategies (CEA+BMT, CAS+BMT, or BMT alone) improve mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction in patients with significant asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis?
This protocol outlines a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of CEA, CAS, and BMT in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the era of modern lipid-lowering therapy.
INTRODUCTION: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid artery stenting (CAS) and best medical therapy (BMT) are the major treatments used for significant asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS, ≥50%). However, the widespread use of lipid-lowering drugs in this century has improved BMT outcomes. This study aims to compare the treatment efficacy of current BMT, CEA+BMT and CAS+BMT in patients with significant ACAS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was designed based on the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. Publication time for studies will be set from 1 January 2000 to 1 June 2020. We will search three databases: PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. Suitable randomised controlled studies will be screened. The primary outcomes will include short-term and long-term mortality, stroke and myocardial infarction. OR and HR for dichotomous data and time-to-event data with 95% CIs will be calculated. Treatment effects among different therapies will be ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve and mean rank. A comprehensive evaluation of the risk of bias, heterogeneity and transitivity will be performed before data synthesis. Consistency and evidence quality will also be assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: There will be no need for ethics approval as this systematic review is a summary and analysis of existing literature. Final results may be presented in international conferences or a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019138942.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Significant asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS, ≥50%). Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) + BMT or carotid artery stenting (CAS) + BMT vs. Best medical therapy (BMT) alone was evaluated on Short-term and long-term mortality, stroke and myocardial infarction. This is a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing CEA, CAS, and best medical therapy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis; no results are available.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: