Key result
Cytopathological examination of 11,562 effusion samples yielded a definitive diagnosis of classifiable malignancy in 7.3% of cases, most frequently adenocarcinoma.
Observational (n=11,562)
Cytology is a useful tool to detect malignant effusions, with adenocarcinoma being the most common malignancy in pleural and peritoneal fluids.
Cytology offers modest diagnostic yield in effusions; extends observational data on adenocarcinoma predominance but leaves prospective validation open.
CONTEXT: The diagnosis of metastatic cancer in fluids is of capital importance as, in most such instances, a rapid fatal outcome of the disease is anticipated. AIM: To determine the spectrum and cytomorphological features of the common and unusual malignancies presenting with effusions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 11,562 effusion samples received for cytopathological examination over a 10-year period were analyzed retrospectively. Cytomorphological features of neoplastic effusions were studied. Special stains and immunocytochemistry (ICC) were performed to aid the diagnosis in difficult cases. OBSERVATIONS: The effusion samples comprised of pleural (5018), peritoneal (6340) and pericardial (204) fluids. A definitive diagnosis of classifiable malignancy could be given in 836 (7.3%) of these cases (5.7% adenocarcinomas and 1.6% uncommon malignancies). Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent cause of malignant pleural (70%) and peritoneal effusions (86.9%). The most common primary site for pleural metastasis was lung (35.7%), while for peritoneal metastasis, it was the ovary (54.3%). Among the uncommon neoplastic effusions, hematopoeitic malignancies were the most frequent, followed by squamous cell carcinomas. Primary malignant mesotheliomas were the most challenging to diagnose on effusion cytology. ICC was useful to arrive at a definitive diagnosis in difficult cases. CONCLUSIONS: Cytology is a useful tool to detect malignant effusions. However, in uncommon malignancies presenting as effusions, a detailed clinical history and ancillary investigations are often required to make a correct diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Neoplastic effusions (n=11,562). Cytopathological examination was evaluated on Definitive diagnosis of classifiable malignancy. Cytopathological examination of 11,562 effusion samples yielded a definitive diagnosis of classifiable malignancy in 7.3% of cases, most frequently adenocarcinoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: