Key result
CMR detected replacement-type myocardial fibrosis in 49% of patients with inflammatory joint diseases and atypical cardiac symptoms versus 0% of controls (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Patients with inflammatory joint diseases have increased cardiovascular risk, prompting the hypothesis that cardiovascular magnetic resonance could detect cardiac abnormalities in those with atypical symptoms unexplained by routine evaluation.
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance detect cardiac abnormalities in symptomatic patients with inflammatory joint diseases and normal routine workup compared to non-IJD controls?
Case-Control (n=91)
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance detect cardiac abnormalities in symptomatic patients with inflammatory joint diseases and normal routine workup compared to non-IJD controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 49% vs 0%
p-value: p=< 0.001
CMR uniquely identifies myocardial inflammation and fibrosis in symptomatic patients with inflammatory joint diseases despite normal routine non-invasive evaluations.
Suggests cardiovascular magnetic resonance may identify occult myocardial fibrosis in symptomatic inflammatory joint disease despite normal routine work.
Background. Patients with inflammatory joint diseases (IJD) are more likely to develop cardiovascular disease compared with the general population. We hypothesized that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) could identify cardiac abnormalities in patients with IJD and atypical symptoms unexplained by routine clinical evaluation. Patients-Methods. A total of 51 consecutive patients with IJD (32 with rheumatoid arthritis, 10 with ankylosing spondylitis, and 9 with psoriatic arthritis) and normal clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic workups, were referred for CMR evaluation due to atypical chest pain, shortness of breath, and/or palpitations. Their CMR findings were compared with those of 40 non-IJD controls who were referred for the same reason. All participants were examined using either a 1.5 T or 3.0 T CMR system. For T1/T2 mapping, comparisons were performed separately for each field strength. Results. Biventricular systolic function was similar between groups. In total, 25 (49%) patients with IJD vs. 0 (0%) controls had replacement-type myocardial fibrosis (p < 0.001). The T2 signal ratio, early/late gadolinium enhancement, and extracellular volume fraction were significantly higher in the IJD group. Native T1 mapping was significantly higher in patients with IJD independent of the MRI field strength (p < 0.001 for both). T2 mapping was significantly higher in patients with IJD compared with controls only in those examined using a 1.5 T MR system—52.0 (50.0, 55.0) vs. 37.0 (33.5, 39.5), p < 0.001. Conclusions. In patients with IJD and a mismatch between cardiac symptoms and routine non-invasive evaluation, CMR uniquely identified a significant proportion of patients with myocardial inflammation. A CMR examination should be considered in patients with IJD in similar clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markousis‐Mavrogenis et al. (2022) conducted a case-control in Inflammatory joint diseases with atypical cardiac symptoms (n=91). Inflammatory joint diseases (IJD) vs. Non-IJD controls was evaluated on Replacement-type myocardial fibrosis (p=< 0.001). CMR detected replacement-type myocardial fibrosis in 49% of patients with inflammatory joint diseases and atypical cardiac symptoms versus 0% of controls (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: