Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 27, 2023Journal of the American Heart AssociationOpen Access

Validating the SMART2 Score in a Racially Diverse High‐Risk Nationwide Cohort of Patients Receiving Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

The SMART2 risk score demonstrated moderate discrimination (c-statistic 64) but underpredicted 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events (observed/expected ratio 1.45) in US veterans undergoing CABG.

Why the study?

The authors sought to test the potential of the Secondary Manifestations of Arterial Disease (SMART2) risk score for use in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Does the SMART2 risk score accurately predict 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events in a racially diverse cohort of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?

Population

27 443 US veterans undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting

Design

External validation cohort study

Follow-up

5 years

Authors

SDSalil V. DeoInterventional / Structural CardiologyAAAndrew D. AlthouseStructural Heart Disease
Sadeer Al‐Kindi
Sadeer Al‐KindiGeneral / Preventive / Lipids

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Suggests caution when using SMART2 for absolute risk estimation post-CABG.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=27,443)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the SMART2 risk score accurately predict 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events in a racially diverse cohort of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?

P
Population
27,443 US veterans (mean age 65 years, 10% Black) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between 2010 and 2019, evaluated for 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events.
E
Exposure
SMART2 risk score calculation
O
Outcome
5-year major adverse cardiovascular event (composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke)composite

Main Result

Effect estimate: c-statistic 64

The SMART2 risk score demonstrates acceptable discrimination but underpredicts absolute risk in patients undergoing CABG, yet remains useful for guiding secondary preventive pharmacotherapy.

Cite This Study

Deo et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in coronary artery bypass grafting (n=27,443). SMART2 risk score was evaluated on 5-year major adverse cardiovascular event (cardiovascular mortality+myocardial infarction+stroke) (c-statistic 64). The SMART2 risk score demonstrated moderate discrimination (c-statistic 64) but underpredicted 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events (observed/expected ratio 1.45) in US veterans undergoing CABG.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8f738cb9ff9c2b5fff5ecdhttps://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.123.030757
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Trends in coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Victoria, 2001–2006: findings from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons database project2008 · 63 citations
  2. 2The independent reduction in mortality associated with guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction2020 · 29 citations
  3. 3Is the SMART risk prediction model ready for real-world implementation? A validation study in a routine care setting of approximately 380 000 individuals2021 · 17 citations
  4. 4Estimation of recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular event risk in patients with established cardiovascular disease: the updated SMART2 algorithm2022 · 130 citations
  5. 52018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines2019 · 6,265 citations