Key result
The SMART2 risk score demonstrated moderate discrimination (c-statistic 64) but underpredicted 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events (observed/expected ratio 1.45) in US veterans undergoing CABG.
Why the study?
The authors sought to test the potential of the Secondary Manifestations of Arterial Disease (SMART2) risk score for use in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Does the SMART2 risk score accurately predict 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events in a racially diverse cohort of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Population
27 443 US veterans undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting
Design
External validation cohort study
Follow-up
5 years
Authors
Loading...
Suggests caution when using SMART2 for absolute risk estimation post-CABG.
Cohort (n=27,443)
Yes
Does the SMART2 risk score accurately predict 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events in a racially diverse cohort of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Effect estimate: c-statistic 64
The SMART2 risk score demonstrates acceptable discrimination but underpredicts absolute risk in patients undergoing CABG, yet remains useful for guiding secondary preventive pharmacotherapy.
Deo et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in coronary artery bypass grafting (n=27,443). SMART2 risk score was evaluated on 5-year major adverse cardiovascular event (cardiovascular mortality+myocardial infarction+stroke) (c-statistic 64). The SMART2 risk score demonstrated moderate discrimination (c-statistic 64) but underpredicted 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events (observed/expected ratio 1.45) in US veterans undergoing CABG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: