Key result
Three-dimensional echocardiography provides significant advantages over two-dimensional imaging for quantitative evaluation of the right ventricle by eliminating the need for geometrical assumptions.
Why the study?
Does three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography improve the quantitative evaluation of right ventricle size and function compared to two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography in patients with cardiopulmonary disease?
Does three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography improve the quantitative evaluation of right ventricle size and function compared to two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography in patients with cardiopulmonary disease?
Three-dimensional echocardiography overcomes the limitations of 2D imaging by providing accurate, geometry-independent quantification of the complex right ventricular chamber.
The right ventricle plays an important role in the morbidity and mortality of patients presenting with symptoms and signs of cardiopulmonary disease. This cardiac chamber has a unique crescent shape, which adds complexity to the quantification of its size and function. Until recently, little uniformity in echocardiographic imaging of the right heart existed because of a lack of familiarity with various techniques, and the enormous attention directed towards left heart quantification. Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography, a major technological breakthrough in the field of cardiovascular imaging, provides several advantages over two-dimensional (2D) imaging in the quantitative evaluations of right ventricle because of its independence from any geometrical assumption. In this review, we focus on the contribution of this new modality to the evaluation of right ventricle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gripari et al. (2015) conducted a review in Right ventricular dysfunction. Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography vs. Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) was evaluated. Three-dimensional echocardiography provides significant advantages over two-dimensional imaging for quantitative evaluation of the right ventricle by eliminating the need for geometrical assumptions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: