Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation with Intermediate Stroke Risk
Presenting authorBoyoung JoungElectrophysiology · Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of KoreaBoyoung Joung is Professor of Internal Medicine in the Cardiology Division at Yonsei University College of Medicine and Vice President of Yonsei University Severance Hospital in Seoul, South Korea. He is Director of the Yonsei Heart Rhythm Center and principal investigator of the Korean multicenter AF registry (CODE-AF). He has chaired the Korean atrial fibrillation guidelines (2018 and 2021) and NOAC guidelines.
Supports DOAC use in intermediate-risk AF; extends randomized evidence beyond high-risk populations.
Key result
DOAC therapy reduced the risk of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or cardiovascular death compared to no anticoagulation (0.5% vs 1.5%; HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.94; P=0.03).
SINGLE-AF has reported — post the first read.
RCT (n=1,803)
Open-label, adjudicator-masked
Yes
Does DOAC therapy reduce the composite risk of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or cardiovascular death compared to no anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation at intermediate risk for stroke?
In patients with atrial fibrillation at intermediate stroke risk, DOAC therapy significantly reduced the composite risk of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or cardiovascular death compared to no anticoagulation.
Hazard Ratio: 0.31 (95% CI 0.1–0.94)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.5% vs 1.5%
Absolute Risk Reduction: 1%
p-value: p=0.03
Kim et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in Atrial fibrillation with intermediate stroke risk (n=1,803). DOAC therapy vs. No anticoagulant therapy was evaluated on Stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death from cardiovascular causes (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.94, p=0.03). DOAC therapy reduced the risk of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or cardiovascular death compared to no anticoagulation (0.5% vs 1.5%; HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.94; P=0.03).