Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate multiscale signal analysis to detect and predict seizures by identifying ictal and pre-ictal conditions in EEG recordings.
EMD is highly accurate for detecting seizures, while a coarse-grained procedure is effective for predicting seizures in EEG signals.
This study evaluates the use of multiscale signal analysis to detect and predict seizures by finding the ictal and pre-ictal condition in electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. There are three processing stages in this study. The first is to decompose EEG signals by using empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and a coarse-grained (CG) procedure to obtain signal information in multiple scales. The second is extracting the features by calculating the fractal dimension of the decomposed signals. Eventually, k-NN, Random Forest, and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers are used to classify ictal and pre-ictal conditions. We evaluate the system using a public dataset from Bonn University. The combination of EMD with five IMFs, FD, and SVM is used for seizure detection (normal vs. ictal) and the three-class problem (normal vs. pre-ictal vs. ictal). The accuracy for seizure detection is 100%. For the three-class problem, we achieved a highest accuracy of 99.7%, and sensitivity and specificity of 99.7% and 99.9%, respectively. The combination of CG, FD, and SVM is proposed to predict a seizure (normal vs. pre-ictal) and achieves a maximum classification accuracy from 99.3% to 100%. These results indicate that the use of EMD with five IMFs is suitable for detecting seizures, while CG is suitable for predicting seizures in EEG signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wijayanto et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: