Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In chicken embryo fibroblasts, the binding of v-Src to PtdIns 3-kinase requires Src homology domains, SH3, SH2 and the SH1 or kinase domain, which induces the cytoskeletal disruption associated with fibroblast transformation. In the rat phaeochromocytoma PC12 cell line, v-Src has a different effect on the cytoskeleton, inducing neurite extension rather than cytoskeletal disruption. Here we show that v-Src-induced neurite outgrowth is suppressed by the selective PtdIns 3-kinase inhibitor LY294002, suggesting that this effect of v-Src in PC12 cells also requires the activity of the lipid kinase. However, in contrast with chicken embryo fibroblasts, the association of PtdIns 3-kinase with v-Src in PC12 cells is delayed until several hours after activating the v-Src tyrosine kinase. Furthermore the v-Src-associated p85 regulatory subunit of PtdIns 3-kinase is not phosphorylated on tyrosine in PC12 cells and associates only weakly with isolated v-Src homology domains (SH3/SH2) in a Src kinase-independent manner. However, p85 and v-Src both associate with an unidentified protein (of molecular mass approx. 68 kDa; termed p68), which becomes tyrosine phosphorylated concomitantly with the association of both p85 and PtdIns 3-kinase with v-Src in PC12 cells. Thus we conclude that the mode of regulation of v-Src-associated PtdIns 3-kinase is cell-context-dependent and that p68 might act as an adaptor protein to mediate the association of p85 and v-Src in PC12 cells. The different regulation of PtdIns 3-kinase in PC12 and in chicken embryo fibroblasts in response to v-Src activity might reflect the different cytoskeletal rearrangements induced by this oncoprotein in the two cell types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haefner et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: